RCE : 1. Upload des fichiers graphiques convertsis en PDF (et non JPEG)

	2- Mis en commentaire des \label=overflow deja dqns les styles

diff --git a/CPU Power impact on execution time.JPG b/CPU Power impact on execution time.JPG
deleted file mode 100644 (file)
index 51e64af..0000000
Binary files a/CPU Power impact on execution time.JPG and /dev/null differ

diff --git a/Cluster x Nodes N1 x N2.JPG b/Cluster x Nodes N1 x N2.JPG
deleted file mode 100644 (file)
index 579f8b0..0000000
Binary files a/Cluster x Nodes N1 x N2.JPG and /dev/null differ

diff --git a/Cluster x Nodes NX=150 and NX=170.JPG b/Cluster x Nodes NX=150 and NX=170.JPG
deleted file mode 100644 (file)
index 1a118a7..0000000
Binary files a/Cluster x Nodes NX=150 and NX=170.JPG and /dev/null differ

diff --git a/Network bandwith impact on execution time.JPG b/Network bandwith impact on execution time.JPG
deleted file mode 100644 (file)
index bd092fb..0000000
Binary files a/Network bandwith impact on execution time.JPG and /dev/null differ

diff --git a/Network latency impact on execution time.JPG b/Network latency impact on execution time.JPG
deleted file mode 100644 (file)
index ab9fd44..0000000
Binary files a/Network latency impact on execution time.JPG and /dev/null differ

diff --git a/Pb size impact on execution time.JPG b/Pb size impact on execution time.JPG
deleted file mode 100644 (file)
index ecaa41d..0000000
Binary files a/Pb size impact on execution time.JPG and /dev/null differ

diff --git a/cluster_x_nodes_n1_x_n2.pdf b/cluster_x_nodes_n1_x_n2.pdf
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..41a966f
Binary files /dev/null and b/cluster_x_nodes_n1_x_n2.pdf differ

diff --git a/cluster_x_nodes_nx_150_and_nx_170.pdf b/cluster_x_nodes_nx_150_and_nx_170.pdf
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..95b10a6
Binary files /dev/null and b/cluster_x_nodes_nx_150_and_nx_170.pdf differ

diff --git a/cpu_power_impact_on_execution_time.pdf b/cpu_power_impact_on_execution_time.pdf
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..1e56dd2
Binary files /dev/null and b/cpu_power_impact_on_execution_time.pdf differ

diff --git a/network_bandwith_impact_on_execution_time.pdf b/network_bandwith_impact_on_execution_time.pdf
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..9d2ffd0
Binary files /dev/null and b/network_bandwith_impact_on_execution_time.pdf differ

diff --git a/network_latency_impact_on_execution_time.pdf b/network_latency_impact_on_execution_time.pdf
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..1c00414
Binary files /dev/null and b/network_latency_impact_on_execution_time.pdf differ

diff --git a/paper.tex b/paper.tex
index 923a1df25bbc9f4c39141e0a982e0997d3d3d722..8583e51c0544644dcb0bcf2c30c10756e237bf0e 100644 (file)
--- a/paper.tex
+++ b/paper.tex
@@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
-%\documentclass[conference]{IEEEtran}
 \documentclass[times]{cpeauth}
 
 \usepackage{moreverb}
@@ -226,14 +225,14 @@ The results in figure 1 show the non-variation of the number of
 iterations of classical GMRES for a given input matrix size; it is not 
 the case for the multisplitting method. 
 
-%%\begin{wrapfigure}{l}{60mm}
+%\begin{wrapfigure}{l}{60mm}
 \begin{figure} [ht!]
 \centering
-\includegraphics[width=60mm]{"Cluster x Nodes NX=150 and NX=170".JPG}
-\caption{Cluster x Nodes NX=150 and NX=170 \label{overflow}}
+\includegraphics[width=60mm]{cluster_x_nodes_nx_150_and_nx_170.pdf}
+\caption{Cluster x Nodes NX=150 and NX=170} 
+%\label{overflow}}
 \end{figure}
-%%\end{wrapfigure}
-
+%\end{wrapfigure}
 
 Unless the 8x8 cluster, the time 
 execution difference between the two algorithms is important when 
@@ -260,11 +259,14 @@ matrix size.
 %\RCE{idem pour tous les tableaux de donnees}
 
 
+%\begin{wrapfigure}{l}{60mm}
 \begin{figure} [ht!]
 \centering
-\includegraphics[width=60mm]{"Cluster x Nodes N1 x N2".JPG}
-\caption{Cluster x Nodes N1 x N2\label{overflow}}
+\includegraphics[width=60mm]{cluster_x_nodes_n1_x_n2.pdf}
+\caption{Cluster x Nodes N1 x N2}
+%\label{overflow}}
 \end{figure}
+%\end{wrapfigure}
 
 The experiments compare the behavior of the algorithms running first on 
 speed inter- cluster network (N1) and a less performant network (N2). 
@@ -291,8 +293,9 @@ Table 3 : Network latency impact
 
 \begin{figure} [ht!]
 \centering
-\includegraphics[width=60mm]{"Network latency impact on execution time".JPG}
-\caption{Network latency impact on execution time\label{overflow}}
+\includegraphics[width=60mm]{network_latency_impact_on_execution_time.pdf}
+\caption{Network latency impact on execution time}
+%\label{overflow}}
 \end{figure}
 
 
@@ -322,8 +325,9 @@ Table 4 : Network bandwidth impact
 
 \begin{figure} [ht!]
 \centering
-\includegraphics[width=60mm]{"Network bandwith impact on execution time".JPG}
-\caption{Network bandwith impact on execution time\label{overflow}}
+\includegraphics[width=60mm]{network_bandwith_impact_on_execution_time.pdf}
+\caption{Network bandwith impact on execution time}
+%\label{overflow}
 \end{figure}
 
 
@@ -350,8 +354,9 @@ Table 5 : Input matrix size impact
 
 \begin{figure} [ht!]
 \centering
-\includegraphics[width=60mm]{"Pb size impact on execution time".JPG}
-\caption{Pb size impact on execution time\label{overflow}}
+\includegraphics[width=60mm]{pb_size_impact_on_execution_time.pdf}
+\caption{Pb size impact on execution time}
+%\label{overflow}}
 \end{figure}
 
 In this experimentation, the input matrix size has been set from 
@@ -384,8 +389,9 @@ Table 6 : CPU Power impact
 
 \begin{figure} [ht!]
 \centering
-\includegraphics[width=60mm]{"CPU Power impact on execution time".JPG}
-\caption{CPU Power impact on execution time\label{overflow}}
+\includegraphics[width=60mm]{cpu_power_impact_on_execution_time.pdf}
+\caption{CPU Power impact on execution time}
+%\label{overflow}}
 \end{figure}
 
 Using the SIMGRID simulator flexibility, we have tried to determine the 

diff --git a/pb_size_impact_on_execution_time.pdf b/pb_size_impact_on_execution_time.pdf
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..f5ddb51
Binary files /dev/null and b/pb_size_impact_on_execution_time.pdf differ