From: RCE Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 16:52:17 +0000 (+0200) Subject: RCE : 1. Upload des fichiers graphiques convertsis en PDF (et non JPEG) X-Git-Url: https://bilbo.iut-bm.univ-fcomte.fr/and/gitweb/rce2015.git/commitdiff_plain/ba23dbc774b2cbdf134b422e9fe09e2f2fadf298?ds=sidebyside;hp=10d434d033a40480bb31b1571deb66fb62350cc7 RCE : 1. Upload des fichiers graphiques convertsis en PDF (et non JPEG) 2- Mis en commentaire des \label=overflow deja dqns les styles --- diff --git a/CPU Power impact on execution time.JPG b/CPU Power impact on execution time.JPG deleted file mode 100644 index 51e64af..0000000 Binary files a/CPU Power impact on execution time.JPG and /dev/null differ diff --git a/Cluster x Nodes N1 x N2.JPG b/Cluster x Nodes N1 x N2.JPG deleted file mode 100644 index 579f8b0..0000000 Binary files a/Cluster x Nodes N1 x N2.JPG and /dev/null differ diff --git a/Cluster x Nodes NX=150 and NX=170.JPG b/Cluster x Nodes NX=150 and NX=170.JPG deleted file mode 100644 index 1a118a7..0000000 Binary files a/Cluster x Nodes NX=150 and NX=170.JPG and /dev/null differ diff --git a/Network bandwith impact on execution time.JPG b/Network bandwith impact on execution time.JPG deleted file mode 100644 index bd092fb..0000000 Binary files a/Network bandwith impact on execution time.JPG and /dev/null differ diff --git a/Network latency impact on execution time.JPG b/Network latency impact on execution time.JPG deleted file mode 100644 index ab9fd44..0000000 Binary files a/Network latency impact on execution time.JPG and /dev/null differ diff --git a/Pb size impact on execution time.JPG b/Pb size impact on execution time.JPG deleted file mode 100644 index ecaa41d..0000000 Binary files a/Pb size impact on execution time.JPG and /dev/null differ diff --git a/cluster_x_nodes_n1_x_n2.pdf b/cluster_x_nodes_n1_x_n2.pdf new file mode 100644 index 0000000..41a966f Binary files /dev/null and b/cluster_x_nodes_n1_x_n2.pdf differ diff --git a/cluster_x_nodes_nx_150_and_nx_170.pdf b/cluster_x_nodes_nx_150_and_nx_170.pdf new file mode 100644 index 0000000..95b10a6 Binary files /dev/null and b/cluster_x_nodes_nx_150_and_nx_170.pdf differ diff --git a/cpu_power_impact_on_execution_time.pdf b/cpu_power_impact_on_execution_time.pdf new file mode 100644 index 0000000..1e56dd2 Binary files /dev/null and b/cpu_power_impact_on_execution_time.pdf differ diff --git a/network_bandwith_impact_on_execution_time.pdf b/network_bandwith_impact_on_execution_time.pdf new file mode 100644 index 0000000..9d2ffd0 Binary files /dev/null and b/network_bandwith_impact_on_execution_time.pdf differ diff --git a/network_latency_impact_on_execution_time.pdf b/network_latency_impact_on_execution_time.pdf new file mode 100644 index 0000000..1c00414 Binary files /dev/null and b/network_latency_impact_on_execution_time.pdf differ diff --git a/paper.tex b/paper.tex index 923a1df..8583e51 100644 --- a/paper.tex +++ b/paper.tex @@ -1,4 +1,3 @@ -%\documentclass[conference]{IEEEtran} \documentclass[times]{cpeauth} \usepackage{moreverb} @@ -226,14 +225,14 @@ The results in figure 1 show the non-variation of the number of iterations of classical GMRES for a given input matrix size; it is not the case for the multisplitting method. -%%\begin{wrapfigure}{l}{60mm} +%\begin{wrapfigure}{l}{60mm} \begin{figure} [ht!] \centering -\includegraphics[width=60mm]{"Cluster x Nodes NX=150 and NX=170".JPG} -\caption{Cluster x Nodes NX=150 and NX=170 \label{overflow}} +\includegraphics[width=60mm]{cluster_x_nodes_nx_150_and_nx_170.pdf} +\caption{Cluster x Nodes NX=150 and NX=170} +%\label{overflow}} \end{figure} -%%\end{wrapfigure} - +%\end{wrapfigure} Unless the 8x8 cluster, the time execution difference between the two algorithms is important when @@ -260,11 +259,14 @@ matrix size. %\RCE{idem pour tous les tableaux de donnees} +%\begin{wrapfigure}{l}{60mm} \begin{figure} [ht!] \centering -\includegraphics[width=60mm]{"Cluster x Nodes N1 x N2".JPG} -\caption{Cluster x Nodes N1 x N2\label{overflow}} +\includegraphics[width=60mm]{cluster_x_nodes_n1_x_n2.pdf} +\caption{Cluster x Nodes N1 x N2} +%\label{overflow}} \end{figure} +%\end{wrapfigure} The experiments compare the behavior of the algorithms running first on speed inter- cluster network (N1) and a less performant network (N2). @@ -291,8 +293,9 @@ Table 3 : Network latency impact \begin{figure} [ht!] \centering -\includegraphics[width=60mm]{"Network latency impact on execution time".JPG} -\caption{Network latency impact on execution time\label{overflow}} +\includegraphics[width=60mm]{network_latency_impact_on_execution_time.pdf} +\caption{Network latency impact on execution time} +%\label{overflow}} \end{figure} @@ -322,8 +325,9 @@ Table 4 : Network bandwidth impact \begin{figure} [ht!] \centering -\includegraphics[width=60mm]{"Network bandwith impact on execution time".JPG} -\caption{Network bandwith impact on execution time\label{overflow}} +\includegraphics[width=60mm]{network_bandwith_impact_on_execution_time.pdf} +\caption{Network bandwith impact on execution time} +%\label{overflow} \end{figure} @@ -350,8 +354,9 @@ Table 5 : Input matrix size impact \begin{figure} [ht!] \centering -\includegraphics[width=60mm]{"Pb size impact on execution time".JPG} -\caption{Pb size impact on execution time\label{overflow}} +\includegraphics[width=60mm]{pb_size_impact_on_execution_time.pdf} +\caption{Pb size impact on execution time} +%\label{overflow}} \end{figure} In this experimentation, the input matrix size has been set from @@ -384,8 +389,9 @@ Table 6 : CPU Power impact \begin{figure} [ht!] \centering -\includegraphics[width=60mm]{"CPU Power impact on execution time".JPG} -\caption{CPU Power impact on execution time\label{overflow}} +\includegraphics[width=60mm]{cpu_power_impact_on_execution_time.pdf} +\caption{CPU Power impact on execution time} +%\label{overflow}} \end{figure} Using the SIMGRID simulator flexibility, we have tried to determine the diff --git a/pb_size_impact_on_execution_time.pdf b/pb_size_impact_on_execution_time.pdf new file mode 100644 index 0000000..f5ddb51 Binary files /dev/null and b/pb_size_impact_on_execution_time.pdf differ