From: ziane Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 16:03:40 +0000 (+0200) Subject: Modifs summary X-Git-Url: https://bilbo.iut-bm.univ-fcomte.fr/and/gitweb/rce2015.git/commitdiff_plain/ba83d1e1dca7d4eaed2a24aa284fc7735dd5fc07?ds=inline;hp=-c Modifs summary Merge branch 'master' of ssh://bilbo.iut-bm.univ-fcomte.fr/rce2015 --- ba83d1e1dca7d4eaed2a24aa284fc7735dd5fc07 diff --combined paper.tex index e73f18a,e6bf766..cda1fdd --- a/paper.tex +++ b/paper.tex @@@ -94,27 -94,32 +94,27 @@@ Email:~\email{l.zianekhodja@ulg.ac.be} } -\begin{abstract} The behavior of multi-core applications is always a challenge -to predict, especially with a new architecture for which no experiment has been -performed. With some applications, it is difficult, if not impossible, to build -accurate performance models. That is why another solution is to use a simulation -tool which allows us to change many parameters of the architecture (network -bandwidth, latency, number of processors) and to simulate the execution of such -applications. The main contribution of this paper is to show that the use of a -simulation tool (here we have decided to use the SimGrid toolkit) can really -help developers to better tune their applications for a given multi-core -architecture. - -%In particular we focus our attention on two parallel iterative algorithms based -%on the Multisplitting algorithm and we compare them to the GMRES algorithm. -%These algorithms are used to solve linear systems. Two different variants of -%the Multisplitting are studied: one using synchronoous iterations and another -%one with asynchronous iterations. -In this paper we focus our attention on the simulation of iterative algorithms to solve sparse linear systems on large clusters. We study the behavior of the widely used GMRES algorithm and two different variants of the Multisplitting algorithms: one using synchronous iterations and another one with asynchronous iterations. -For each algorithm we have simulated -different architecture parameters to evaluate their influence on the overall -execution time. -%The obtain simulated results confirm the real results -%previously obtained on different real multi-core architectures and also confirm -%the efficiency of the asynchronous Multisplitting algorithm compared to the -%synchronous GMRES method. -The simulations confirm the real results previously obtained on different real multi-core architectures and also confirm the efficiency of the asynchronous Multisplitting algorithm on distant clusters compared to the synchronous GMRES algorithm. - +\begin{abstract} %% The behavior of multi-core applications is always a challenge +%% to predict, especially with a new architecture for which no experiment has been +%% performed. With some applications, it is difficult, if not impossible, to build +%% accurate performance models. That is why another solution is to use a simulation +%% tool which allows us to change many parameters of the architecture (network +%% bandwidth, latency, number of processors) and to simulate the execution of such +%% applications. The main contribution of this paper is to show that the use of a +%% simulation tool (here we have decided to use the SimGrid toolkit) can really +%% help developers to better tune their applications for a given multi-core +%% architecture. + +%% In this paper we focus our attention on the simulation of iterative algorithms to solve sparse linear systems on large clusters. We study the behavior of the widely used GMRES algorithm and two different variants of the Multisplitting algorithms: one using synchronous iterations and another one with asynchronous iterations. +%% For each algorithm we have simulated +%% different architecture parameters to evaluate their influence on the overall +%% execution time. +%% The simulations confirm the real results previously obtained on different real multi-core architectures and also confirm the efficiency of the asynchronous Multisplitting algorithm on distant clusters compared to the synchronous GMRES algorithm. + + +The behavior of multi-core applications is always a challenge to predict, especially with a new architecture for which no experiment has been performed. With some applications, it is difficult, if not impossible, to build accurate performance models. That is why another solution is to use a simulation tool which allows us to change many parameters of the architecture (network bandwidth, latency, number of processors) and to simulate the execution of such applications. + +In this paper we focus on the simulation of iterative algorithms to solve sparse linear systems. We study the behavior of the GMRES algorithm and two different variants of the Multisplitting algorithms: using synchronous or asynchronous iterations. For each algorithm we have simulated different architecture parameters to evaluate their influence on the overall execution time. The simulations confirm the real results previously obtained on different real multi-core architectures and also confirm the efficiency of the asynchronous Multisplitting algorithm on distant clusters compared to the GMRES algorithm. \end{abstract} %\keywords{Algorithm; distributed; iterative; asynchronous; simulation; simgrid; @@@ -873,7 -878,29 +873,29 @@@ geographically distant clusters throug \section{Conclusion} - CONCLUSION + + In this paper we have presented the simulation of the execution of three + different parallel solvers on some multi-core architectures. We have show that + the SimGrid toolkit is an interesting simulation tool that has allowed us to + determine which method to choose given a specified multi-core architecture. + Moreover the simulated results are in accordance (i.e. with the same order of + magnitude) with the works presented in~\cite{couturier15}. Simulated results + also confirm the efficiency of the asynchronous multisplitting + algorithm compared to the synchronous GMRES especially in case of + geographically distant clusters. + + These results are important since it is very time consuming to find optimal + configuration and deployment requirements for a given application on a given + multi-core architecture. Finding good resource allocations policies under + varying CPU power, network speeds and loads is very challenging and labor + intensive. This problematic is even more difficult for the asynchronous + scheme where a small parameter variation of the execution platform and of the + application data can lead to very different numbers of iterations to reach the + converge and so to very different execution times. + + + Our future works... + %\section*{Acknowledgment}