From b9555d55cef3c57b08eed2fcc49fa3a5f1834365 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: couturie <raphael.couturier@univ-fcomte.Fr>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 14:37:07 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] modif des subsubsection
---
paper.tex | 9 ++++-----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/paper.tex b/paper.tex
index 8bdc8f3..3c38513 100644
--- a/paper.tex
+++ b/paper.tex
@@ -550,8 +550,7 @@ Grid architecture & 2$\times$16, 4$\times$8, 4$\times$16 a
\end{table}
\subsubsection{Simulations for various grid architectures and scaling-up matrix sizes}
-\ \\
-% environment
+
In this section, we analyze the simulations conducted on various grid
configurations and for different sizes of the 3D Poisson problem. The parameters
of the network between clusters is fixed to $N2$ (see
@@ -611,7 +610,7 @@ the network speed drops down (variation of 12.5\%), the difference between t
\subsubsection{Network latency impacts on performance}
-\ \\
+
\begin{table} [ht!]
\centering
\begin{tabular}{r c }
@@ -643,7 +642,7 @@ decreasing from $8.10^{-6}$ to $6.10^{-5}$ second.
\subsubsection{Network bandwidth impacts on performance}
-\ \\
+
\begin{table} [ht!]
\centering
\begin{tabular}{r c }
@@ -676,7 +675,7 @@ presents a better performance in the considered bandwidth interval with a gain
of $40\%$ which is only around $24\%$ for the classical GMRES.
\subsubsection{Input matrix size impacts on performance}
-\ \\
+
\begin{table} [ht!]
\centering
\begin{tabular}{r c }
--
2.39.5