From b9555d55cef3c57b08eed2fcc49fa3a5f1834365 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: couturie <raphael.couturier@univ-fcomte.Fr>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 14:37:07 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] modif des subsubsection

---
 paper.tex | 9 ++++-----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/paper.tex b/paper.tex
index 8bdc8f3..3c38513 100644
--- a/paper.tex
+++ b/paper.tex
@@ -550,8 +550,7 @@ Grid architecture                       & 2$\times$16, 4$\times$8, 4$\times$16 a
 \end{table}
 
 \subsubsection{Simulations for various grid architectures and scaling-up matrix sizes}
-\  \\
-% environment
+
 In  this  section,  we  analyze   the  simulations  conducted  on  various  grid
 configurations and for different sizes of the 3D Poisson problem. The parameters
 of    the    network    between    clusters    is    fixed    to    $N2$    (see
@@ -611,7 +610,7 @@ the  network speed  drops down (variation of 12.5\%), the  difference between  t
 
 
 \subsubsection{Network latency impacts on performance}
-\ \\
+
 \begin{table} [ht!]
 \centering
 \begin{tabular}{r c }
@@ -643,7 +642,7 @@ decreasing from $8.10^{-6}$ to $6.10^{-5}$ second.
 
 
 \subsubsection{Network bandwidth impacts on performance}
-\ \\
+
 \begin{table} [ht!]
 \centering
 \begin{tabular}{r c }
@@ -676,7 +675,7 @@ presents a better  performance in the considered bandwidth interval  with a gain
 of $40\%$ which is only around $24\%$ for the classical GMRES.
 
 \subsubsection{Input matrix size impacts on performance}
-\ \\
+
 \begin{table} [ht!]
 \centering
 \begin{tabular}{r c }
-- 
2.39.5