From ca1429f05161a13a6c9cc1eb4a62dcb8217c06d2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: couturie Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 14:40:13 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] =?utf8?q?retour=20en=20arri=C3=A8re?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --- paper.tex | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/paper.tex b/paper.tex index 3c38513..ab8f9ab 100644 --- a/paper.tex +++ b/paper.tex @@ -549,7 +549,7 @@ Grid architecture & 2$\times$16, 4$\times$8, 4$\times$16 a \end{center} \end{table} -\subsubsection{Simulations for various grid architectures and scaling-up matrix sizes} +\subsubsection{Simulations for various grid architectures and scaling-up matrix sizes\\} In this section, we analyze the simulations conducted on various grid configurations and for different sizes of the 3D Poisson problem. The parameters @@ -572,7 +572,7 @@ The execution times between both algorithms is significant with different grid a \label{fig:01} \end{figure} -\subsubsection{Simulations for two different inter-clusters network speeds \\} +\subsubsection{Simulations for two different inter-clusters network speeds\\} In this section, the experiments compare the behavior of the algorithms running on a speeder inter-cluster network (N2) and also on a less performant network (N1) respectively defined in the test conditions Table~\ref{tab:02}. @@ -609,7 +609,7 @@ the network speed drops down (variation of 12.5\%), the difference between t -\subsubsection{Network latency impacts on performance} +\subsubsection{Network latency impacts on performance\\} \begin{table} [ht!] \centering @@ -641,7 +641,7 @@ between the two algorithms varies from 2.2 to 1.5 times with a network latency decreasing from $8.10^{-6}$ to $6.10^{-5}$ second. -\subsubsection{Network bandwidth impacts on performance} +\subsubsection{Network bandwidth impacts on performance\\} \begin{table} [ht!] \centering @@ -674,7 +674,7 @@ Figure~\ref{fig:04}). However, in this case, the Krylov multisplitting method presents a better performance in the considered bandwidth interval with a gain of $40\%$ which is only around $24\%$ for the classical GMRES. -\subsubsection{Input matrix size impacts on performance} +\subsubsection{Input matrix size impacts on performance\\} \begin{table} [ht!] \centering -- 2.39.5