From ff26f153a398274edd3bd11d85850f6319d63149 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: lilia <lilia@agora>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 00:35:19 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] =?utf8?q?Suite=20corrections=20exp=C3=A9s:=20*petites?=
 =?utf8?q?=20modifs=20dans=20les=20tableaux?=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

---
 paper.tex | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/paper.tex b/paper.tex
index ca172c0..f01a0f4 100644
--- a/paper.tex
+++ b/paper.tex
@@ -558,7 +558,7 @@ In what follows, we will present the test conditions, the output results and our
 \begin{tabular}{ll }
  \hline
  Grid architecture & 2$\times$16, 4$\times$8, 4$\times$16 and 8$\times$8\\ %\hline
- Network           & N1 : $bw$=1Gbits/s, $lat$=5.10$^{-5}$ \\ %\hline
+ Network           & N1 : $bw$=1Gbits/s, $lat$=5$\times$10$^{-5}$ \\ %\hline
  \multirow{2}{*}{Matrix size}  & N$_{x}$ $\times$ N$_{y}$ $\times$ N$_{z}$ =150 $\times$ 150 $\times$ 150\\ %\hline
   &  N$_{x}$ $\times$ N$_{y}$ $\times$ N$_{z}$  =170 $\times$ 170 $\times$ 170    \\ \hline
  \end{tabular}
@@ -602,8 +602,8 @@ $40\%$ better (resp. $48\%$) when running from 2x16=32 to 8x8=64 processors.
 \begin{tabular}{ll}
  \hline
  Grid architecture        & 2$\times$16, 4$\times$8\\ %\hline
- \multirow{2}{*}{Network} & N1: $bw$=1Gbs, $lat$=5.10$^{-5}$ \\ %\hline
-                          & N2: $bw$=10Gbs, $lat$=8.10$^{-6}$ \\
+ \multirow{2}{*}{Network} & N1: $bw$=1Gbs, $lat$=5$\times$10$^{-5}$ \\ %\hline
+                          & N2: $bw$=10Gbs, $lat$=8$\times$10$^{-6}$ \\
  Matrix size              & $N_{x} \times N_{y} \times N_{z} =150 \times 150 \times 150$\\ \hline
  \end{tabular}
 \caption{Test conditions: grid configurations 2$\times$16 and 4$\times$8 with networks N1 vs. N2}
-- 
2.39.5