X-Git-Url: https://bilbo.iut-bm.univ-fcomte.fr/and/gitweb/review_prng.git/blobdiff_plain/c55c7184a8501fd1c822a5cc6aebfd5f06399484..d8286f1f28ed46780c8a9943ff22a09a1905aa55:/review_prng.tex?ds=sidebyside

diff --git a/review_prng.tex b/review_prng.tex
index b395874..f595d05 100644
--- a/review_prng.tex
+++ b/review_prng.tex
@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ With all this material, the study of chaotic iterations as a discrete
 dynamical system has then be realized. 
 This study is summarized in the next section.
 
-\subsection{Topological Properties of Chaotic Iterations}
+\subsection{A Topology for Chaotic Iterations}
 
 The topological space on which chaotic iterations are defined has
 firstly been investigated, leading to the following result~\cite{gb11:bc,GuyeuxThese10}:
@@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ of period $k$ for $f$, we have
  $\forall k \in \mathds{N}, Per_{2k+1}(G_{f_0}) = \varnothing, card\left(Per_{2k+2}(G_{f_0})\right)>0$.
 \end{proposition}
  
-So $\Rightarrow G_{f_0}$ does not present the existence of points of any period referred as chaos in the article of Li and Yorke~\cite{Li75}.
+So $ G_{f_0}$ does not present the existence of points of any period referred as chaos in the article of Li and Yorke~\cite{Li75}.
 However~\cite{GuyeuxThese10}:
      \begin{itemize}
        \item This kind of disorder can be stated on $\mathcal{X}^G = \mathcal{P}\left(\llbracket 1,\mathsf{N}\rrbracket\right)^\mathds{N}\times \mathds{B}^\mathsf{N}$.
@@ -262,6 +262,14 @@ However~\cite{GuyeuxThese10}:
 Additionally, this existence of points of any period has been rejected
 by the community to the benefit of more recent notions of chaos, 
 like those developed these last decades by Devaney~\cite{Devaney}, Knudsen~\cite{Knudsen94}, etc.
+These approaches are recalled in the next section.
+
+\section{The Mathematical Theory of Chaos}
+
+We will present in this section various understanding of a chaotic behavior for a discrete
+dynamical system.
+
+\subsection{Approaches Similar to Devaney}
 
 In these approaches, three ingredients are required for unpredictability. 
 Firstly, the system must be intrinsically complicated, undecomposable: it cannot be simplified into two
@@ -298,34 +306,22 @@ not equivalent one another, like:
 \end{itemize}
 
 
-Concerning the ingredient of sensibility, it can be formulated as follows.
-
-%\frame{
-%\frametitle{StabilitÃ© et expansivitÃ©}
-%   \begin{block}{DÃ©finitions de la sensibilitÃ©}
-%     \begin{itemize}
-%       \item $(\mathcal{X},f)$ est \emph{instable} si tous ses points le sont: $\forall x \in \mathcal{X},$ $\exists \varepsilon >0,$ $\forall \delta > 0,$ $\exists y \in \mathcal{X},$ $\exists n \in \mathbb{N},$ $d(x,y)<\delta$  et $d(f^{(n)}(x),f^{(n)}(y)) \geqslant \varepsilon$
-%       \item $(\mathcal{X},f)$ est \emph{expansif} si
-%$\exists \varepsilon >0,$ $\forall x \neq y,$ $\exists n \in \mathbb{N},$ $d(f^{(n)}(x),f^{(n)}(y)) \geqslant \varepsilon$
-%     \end{itemize}
-%   \end{block}
-%}
+Concerning the ingredient of sensibility, it can be reformulated as follows.
+\begin{itemize}
+  \item $(\mathcal{X},f)$ is \emph{unstable} is all its points are unstable: $\forall x \in \mathcal{X},$ $\exists \varepsilon >0,$ $\forall \delta > 0,$ $\exists y \in \mathcal{X},$ $\exists n \in \mathbb{N},$ $d(x,y)<\delta$ and $d(f^{(n)}(x),f^{(n)}(y)) \geqslant \varepsilon$.
+  \item $(\mathcal{X},f)$ is \emph{expansive} is $\exists \varepsilon >0,$ $\forall x \neq y,$ $\exists n \in \mathbb{N},$ $d(f^{(n)}(x),f^{(n)}(y)) \geqslant \varepsilon$
+\end{itemize}
 
-%%\frame{
-%%  \frametitle{Des systÃ¨mes imprÃ©visibles}
-%%    \begin{block}{DÃ©finitions des systÃ¨mes dynamiques dÃ©sordonnÃ©s}
-%%    \begin{itemize}
-%%      \item \emph{Devaney:} $(\mathcal{X},f)$ est sensible aux conditions initiales, rÃ©gulier et transitif
-%%       \item \emph{Wiggins:} $(\mathcal{X},f)$ est transitif et sensible aux conditions initiales
-%%       \item \emph{Knudsen:} $(\mathcal{X},f)$ a une orbite dense et s'il est sensible aux conditions initiales
-%%       \item \emph{expansif:} $(\mathcal{X},f)$ est transitif, rÃ©gulier et expansif
-%%    \end{itemize}
-%%    \end{block}
-%%}
+These variety of definitions lead to various notions of chaos. For instance, 
+a dynamical system is chaotic according to Wiggins if it is transitive and
+sensible to the initial conditions. It is said chaotic according to Knudsen
+if it has a dense orbit while being sensible. Finally, we speak about
+expansive chaos when the properties of transitivity, regularity, and expansivity
+are satisfied.
 
 
 
-%\subsection*{Autres approches}
+\subsection{Other approaches}
 
 
 %\frame{
