This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-1.40.10 (TeX Live 2009/Debian) (format=pdflatex 2012.12.6) 1 JUL 2013 11:28 entering extended mode %&-line parsing enabled. **\input review.tex (./review.tex (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/base/article.cls Document Class: article 2007/10/19 v1.4h Standard LaTeX document class (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/base/size10.clo File: size10.clo 2007/10/19 v1.4h Standard LaTeX file (size option) ) \c@part=\count79 \c@section=\count80 \c@subsection=\count81 \c@subsubsection=\count82 \c@paragraph=\count83 \c@subparagraph=\count84 \c@figure=\count85 \c@table=\count86 \abovecaptionskip=\skip41 \belowcaptionskip=\skip42 \bibindent=\dimen102 ) (./review.aux) \openout1 = `review.aux'. LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for OML/cmm/m/it on input line 4. LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 4. LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for T1/cmr/m/n on input line 4. LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 4. LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for OT1/cmr/m/n on input line 4. LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 4. LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for OMS/cmsy/m/n on input line 4. LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 4. LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for OMX/cmex/m/n on input line 4. LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 4. LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for U/cmr/m/n on input line 4. LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 4. LaTeX Font Info: External font `cmex10' loaded for size (Font) <12> on input line 5. LaTeX Font Info: External font `cmex10' loaded for size (Font) <8> on input line 5. LaTeX Font Info: External font `cmex10' loaded for size (Font) <6> on input line 5. LaTeX Warning: No \author given. [1 {/var/lib/texmf/fonts/map/pdftex/updmap/pdftex.map}] Overfull \hbox (6.74693pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 88--88 [] \OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 below. An *iso*line would normally be expected to delineat e areas[] [] Overfull \hbox (6.74693pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 88--88 [] \OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 of the *same* intensity, so it's not obvious why a std devn should[] [] Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 88--88 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 be associated with one. This doesn't become clear until wel l into[] [] Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 88--88 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 section 6!! The authors need to explain (even if only briefl y) how[] [] Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 88--88 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 associating a pixel with an isoline removes noise *early* in their[] [] Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 88--88 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 paper. I would suggest moving figure 4(a,b,c) to the introd uction[] [] Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 88--88 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 and adding the set of isolines that their process adds to th e that[] [] Overfull \hbox (6.74693pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 88--88 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 noisy window. Since it's only an 11x11 window, there should be only[] [] Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 88--88 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 the edge region, then something like the isoline through eve ry 2nd[] [] [2] Overfull \hbox (11.99689pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 108--108 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 There is a key inconsistency in presentation .. there is a s tatement[] [] Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 108--108 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 that 'most common' images are continuous and continuous few edges.[] [] Overfull \hbox (27.74675pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 108--108 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 Such images would contain little information and be of littl e interest.[] [] Overfull \hbox (11.99689pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 108--108 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 However, tests have been conducted on 'real' images with no shortage[] [] Overfull \hbox (6.74693pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 108--108 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 of edges - see figure 7b. If the continuity and few edges co ndition[] [] Overfull \hbox (6.74693pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 108--108 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 actually important (as results suggest), then these referenc es need[] [] Overfull \hbox (17.24684pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 115--115 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 Circular poly-isolines are apparently excluded which would s eem to be[] [] Overfull \hbox (27.74675pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 125--125 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 In general, the paper could be a lot better written. The au thors might[] [] Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 125--125 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 remove the 'noise' (in the sense of unnecessary words and ph rases)[] [] Overfull \hbox (11.99689pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 134--134 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 Similarly, figure 9 contains excess noise in the form of mea ningless[] [] Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 134--134 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 digits in numbers presented. By convention, if you write 19.49,[] [] Missing character: There is no  in font cmtt10! Missing character: There is no ± in font cmtt10! LaTeX Font Info: External font `cmex10' loaded for size (Font) <7> on input line 136. LaTeX Font Info: External font `cmex10' loaded for size (Font) <5> on input line 136. Overfull \hbox (9.13957pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 135--139 \OT1/cmr/m/n/10 That is not ex-act: Let us con-sider a noisy $512 \OMS/cmsy/m/n /10 ^^B \OT1/cmr/m/n/10 512$ pixel im-age of PSNR=19.50 dB. [] [3] Overfull \hbox (6.74693pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 150--150 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 This table would be further improved by reporting the *impro vement*[] [] Overfull \hbox (6.74693pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 215--215 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 If they just 'propose to address' something, then this paper should[] [] Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 215--215 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 reference list - just use the author(s)' names as in the sug gested[] [] Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 215--215 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 more precise wording is needed: I don't think anyone is inte rested[] [] Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 215--215 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 The final sentence is almost inviting a reader to skip readi ng the[] [] [4] [5] Overfull \hbox (6.74693pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 264--264 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 Giving the actual rates (in terms, say, of frames per second ) would[] [] Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 264--264 [] \OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 be even better in putting the author's current work into co ntext![] [] Overfull \hbox (17.24684pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 276--276 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 'apparently sub-optimal' implies that they might really be o ptimal ..[] [] Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 276--276 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 it would seem that you're referring to the usual trade-off b etween[] [] Overfull \hbox (22.4968pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 276--276 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 lower quality algortithms that run faster .. so say that .. in 5 words[] [] [6] Overfull \hbox (43.49661pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 311--311 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 .. have been published. Where?? At least some sample refere nces required.[] [] Overfull \hbox (6.74693pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 339--339 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 Nvidia themselves are rather vague about this, but that's no excuse[] [] Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 339--339 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 vagueness into (hopefully) carefully written and objective p apers.[] [] [7] Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 339--339 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 perspective with the clock rate. I shouldn't have to look t his up[] [] Overfull \hbox (27.74675pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 374--374 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 The 'A' of CUDA is 'architecture' .. adding 'model' is not n ecessary ..[] [] Overfull \hbox (11.99689pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 374--374 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 lie in the same n mod 2^7 address block .. not an arbitrary 2^7 byte[] [] [8] Overfull \hbox (27.74675pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 412--412 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 Small point, but this is a journal paper .. so you should ge t it right![] [] Overfull \hbox (6.74693pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 427--427 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 'As introduced above' .. where ?? In the previous para, you' ve just[] [] Overfull \hbox (11.99689pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 427--427 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 If you want to persist with this, then you should give some examples[] [] Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 427--427 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 There are many images used for testing image processing algo rithms[] [] [9] Overfull \hbox (22.4968pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 487--487 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 You're defining a notation here .. don't use words implying vagueness![] [] Overfull \hbox (6.74693pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 487--487 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 You mean that the two segments S^n and S^p must have the sam e mean?[] [] [10] Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 504--504 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 which appears to have the *same* intensity along its whole l ength.[] [] [11] Overfull \hbox (17.24684pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 556--556 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 how do you have C_x(Z(S^n)) .. having been obtained in the * previous*[] [] [12] Overfull \hbox (53.99652pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 620--620 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 (you use deviation in another sense also .. so you need to b e specific here)[] [] Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 636--636 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 The notation [0;D] for the set [0..D] is also unusual and pr obably[] [] [13] Overfull \hbox (6.74693pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 665--665 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 only for P_l, not for the images themselves, which are much larger.[] [] Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 665--665 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 effort. In this case, it would appear that there are a suff icient[] [] Overfull \hbox (6.74693pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 677--677 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 Results should ideally separate out time to transfer images between[] [] Overfull \hbox (6.74693pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 677--677 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 and GPU computation times, since for applications (most pres umably)[] [] Overfull \hbox (6.74693pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 686--686 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 There is a disappointing lack of data for values of l other than 5.[] [] [14] [15] (./review.aux) ) Here is how much of TeX's memory you used: 232 strings out of 495028 2464 string characters out of 1181229 52031 words of memory out of 3000000 3492 multiletter control sequences out of 15000+50000 7794 words of font info for 28 fonts, out of 3000000 for 9000 28 hyphenation exceptions out of 8191 23i,6n,17p,305b,245s stack positions out of 5000i,500n,10000p,200000b,50000s Output written on review.pdf (15 pages, 157774 bytes). PDF statistics: 95 PDF objects out of 1000 (max. 8388607) 0 named destinations out of 1000 (max. 500000) 1 words of extra memory for PDF output out of 10000 (max. 10000000)