This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-1.40.10 (TeX Live 2009/Debian) (format=pdflatex 2012.12.6) 1 JUL 2013 11:28 entering extended mode %&-line parsing enabled. **\input review.tex (./review.tex (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/base/article.cls Document Class: article 2007/10/19 v1.4h Standard LaTeX document class (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/base/size10.clo File: size10.clo 2007/10/19 v1.4h Standard LaTeX file (size option) ) \c@part=\count79 \c@section=\count80 \c@subsection=\count81 \c@subsubsection=\count82 \c@paragraph=\count83 \c@subparagraph=\count84 \c@figure=\count85 \c@table=\count86 \abovecaptionskip=\skip41 \belowcaptionskip=\skip42 \bibindent=\dimen102 ) (./review.aux) \openout1 = `review.aux'. LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for OML/cmm/m/it on input line 4. LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 4. LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for T1/cmr/m/n on input line 4. LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 4. LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for OT1/cmr/m/n on input line 4. LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 4. LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for OMS/cmsy/m/n on input line 4. LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 4. LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for OMX/cmex/m/n on input line 4. LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 4. LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for U/cmr/m/n on input line 4. LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 4. LaTeX Font Info: External font `cmex10' loaded for size (Font) <12> on input line 5. LaTeX Font Info: External font `cmex10' loaded for size (Font) <8> on input line 5. LaTeX Font Info: External font `cmex10' loaded for size (Font) <6> on input line 5. LaTeX Warning: No \author given. [1 {/var/lib/texmf/fonts/map/pdftex/updmap/pdftex.map}] Overfull \hbox (6.74693pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 88--88 [] \OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 below. An *iso*line would normally be expected to delineat e areas[] [] Overfull \hbox (6.74693pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 88--88 [] \OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 of the *same* intensity, so it's not obvious why a std devn should[] [] Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 88--88 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 be associated with one. This doesn't become clear until wel l into[] [] Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 88--88 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 section 6!! The authors need to explain (even if only briefl y) how[] [] Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 88--88 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 associating a pixel with an isoline removes noise *early* in their[] [] Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 88--88 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 paper. I would suggest moving figure 4(a,b,c) to the introd uction[] [] Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 88--88 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 and adding the set of isolines that their process adds to th e that[] [] Overfull \hbox (6.74693pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 88--88 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 noisy window. Since it's only an 11x11 window, there should be only[] [] Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 88--88 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 the edge region, then something like the isoline through eve ry 2nd[] [] [2] Overfull \hbox (11.99689pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 108--108 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 There is a key inconsistency in presentation .. there is a s tatement[] [] Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 108--108 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 that 'most common' images are continuous and continuous few edges.[] [] Overfull \hbox (27.74675pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 108--108 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 Such images would contain little information and be of littl e interest.[] [] Overfull \hbox (11.99689pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 108--108 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 However, tests have been conducted on 'real' images with no shortage[] [] Overfull \hbox (6.74693pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 108--108 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 of edges - see figure 7b. If the continuity and few edges co ndition[] [] Overfull \hbox (6.74693pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 108--108 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 actually important (as results suggest), then these referenc es need[] [] Overfull \hbox (17.24684pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 115--115 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 Circular poly-isolines are apparently excluded which would s eem to be[] [] Overfull \hbox (27.74675pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 125--125 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 In general, the paper could be a lot better written. The au thors might[] [] Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 125--125 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 remove the 'noise' (in the sense of unnecessary words and ph rases)[] [] Overfull \hbox (11.99689pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 134--134 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 Similarly, figure 9 contains excess noise in the form of mea ningless[] [] Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 134--134 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 digits in numbers presented. By convention, if you write 19.49,[] [] Missing character: There is no  in font cmtt10! Missing character: There is no ± in font cmtt10! LaTeX Font Info: External font `cmex10' loaded for size (Font) <7> on input line 136. LaTeX Font Info: External font `cmex10' loaded for size (Font) <5> on input line 136. Overfull \hbox (9.13957pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 135--139 \OT1/cmr/m/n/10 That is not ex-act: Let us con-sider a noisy $512 \OMS/cmsy/m/n /10 ^^B \OT1/cmr/m/n/10 512$ pixel im-age of PSNR=19.50 dB. [] [3] Overfull \hbox (6.74693pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 150--150 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 This table would be further improved by reporting the *impro vement*[] [] Overfull \hbox (6.74693pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 215--215 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 If they just 'propose to address' something, then this paper should[] [] Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 215--215 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 reference list - just use the author(s)' names as in the sug gested[] [] Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 215--215 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 more precise wording is needed: I don't think anyone is inte rested[] [] Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 215--215 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 The final sentence is almost inviting a reader to skip readi ng the[] [] [4] [5] Overfull \hbox (6.74693pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 264--264 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 Giving the actual rates (in terms, say, of frames per second ) would[] [] Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 264--264 [] \OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 be even better in putting the author's current work into co ntext![] [] Overfull \hbox (17.24684pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 276--276 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 'apparently sub-optimal' implies that they might really be o ptimal ..[] [] Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 276--276 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 it would seem that you're referring to the usual trade-off b etween[] [] Overfull \hbox (22.4968pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 276--276 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 lower quality algortithms that run faster .. so say that .. in 5 words[] [] [6] Overfull \hbox (43.49661pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 311--311 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 .. have been published. Where?? At least some sample refere nces required.[] [] Overfull \hbox (6.74693pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 339--339 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 Nvidia themselves are rather vague about this, but that's no excuse[] [] Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 339--339 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 vagueness into (hopefully) carefully written and objective p apers.[] [] [7] Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 339--339 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 perspective with the clock rate. I shouldn't have to look t his up[] [] Overfull \hbox (27.74675pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 374--374 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 The 'A' of CUDA is 'architecture' .. adding 'model' is not n ecessary ..[] [] Overfull \hbox (11.99689pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 374--374 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 lie in the same n mod 2^7 address block .. not an arbitrary 2^7 byte[] [] [8] Overfull \hbox (27.74675pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 412--412 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 Small point, but this is a journal paper .. so you should ge t it right![] [] Overfull \hbox (6.74693pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 427--427 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 'As introduced above' .. where ?? In the previous para, you' ve just[] [] Overfull \hbox (11.99689pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 427--427 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 If you want to persist with this, then you should give some examples[] [] Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 427--427 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 There are many images used for testing image processing algo rithms[] [] [9] Overfull \hbox (22.4968pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 487--487 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 You're defining a notation here .. don't use words implying vagueness![] [] Overfull \hbox (6.74693pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 487--487 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 You mean that the two segments S^n and S^p must have the sam e mean?[] [] [10] Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 504--504 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 which appears to have the *same* intensity along its whole l ength.[] [] [11] Overfull \hbox (17.24684pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 556--556 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 how do you have C_x(Z(S^n)) .. having been obtained in the * previous*[] [] [12] Overfull \hbox (53.99652pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 620--620 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 (you use deviation in another sense also .. so you need to b e specific here)[] [] Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 636--636 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 The notation [0;D] for the set [0..D] is also unusual and pr obably[] [] [13] Overfull \hbox (6.74693pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 665--665 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 only for P_l, not for the images themselves, which are much larger.[] [] Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 665--665 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 effort. In this case, it would appear that there are a suff icient[] [] Overfull \hbox (6.74693pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 677--677 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 Results should ideally separate out time to transfer images between[] [] Overfull \hbox (6.74693pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 677--677 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 and GPU computation times, since for applications (most pres umably)[] [] Overfull \hbox (6.74693pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 686--686 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 There is a disappointing lack of data for values of l other than 5.[] [] [14] [15] (./review.aux) ) Here is how much of TeX's memory you used: 232 strings out of 495028 2464 string characters out of 1181229 52031 words of memory out of 3000000 3492 multiletter control sequences out of 15000+50000 7794 words of font info for 28 fonts, out of 3000000 for 9000 28 hyphenation exceptions out of 8191 23i,6n,17p,305b,245s stack positions out of 5000i,500n,10000p,200000b,50000s </usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts /cm/cmbx12.pfb></usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts/cm/cmex10. pfb></usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts/cm/cmmi10.pfb></usr/s hare/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts/cm/cmmi7.pfb></usr/share/texmf-t exlive/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts/cm/cmr10.pfb></usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts /type1/public/amsfonts/cm/cmr12.pfb></usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/publi c/amsfonts/cm/cmr17.pfb></usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts/c m/cmr7.pfb></usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts/cm/cmsy10.pfb> </usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts/cm/cmti10.pfb></usr/share /texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts/cm/cmtt10.pfb> Output written on review.pdf (15 pages, 157774 bytes). PDF statistics: 95 PDF objects out of 1000 (max. 8388607) 0 named destinations out of 1000 (max. 500000) 1 words of extra memory for PDF output out of 10000 (max. 10000000)