corrections

diff --git a/hpcc.tex b/hpcc.tex
index 34c35a770445a4642909e72627450bafe41006fa..31a69648bcbc756da7156174daf45d6bcd3bcbd0 100644 (file)
--- a/hpcc.tex
+++ b/hpcc.tex
@@ -659,7 +659,7 @@ the results have given a relative gain more than 2.5, showing the effectiveness
 asynchronous performance compared to the synchronous mode.
 
 With these settings, Table~\ref{tab.cluster.2x50} shows
 asynchronous performance compared to the synchronous mode.
 
 With these settings, Table~\ref{tab.cluster.2x50} shows

-that after a deterioration of inter cluster network with a bandwidth of \np[Mbit/s]{5} and a latency in order of one hundredth of millisecond and a processor power
+that after setting the bandwidth of the  inter cluster network to  \np[Mbit/s]{5} and a latency in order of one hundredth of millisecond and a processor power

 of one GFlops, an efficiency of about \np[\%]{40} is
 obtained in asynchronous mode for a matrix size of 62 elements. It is noticed that the result remains
 stable even we vary the residual error precision from \np{E-5} to \np{E-9}. By
 of one GFlops, an efficiency of about \np[\%]{40} is
 obtained in asynchronous mode for a matrix size of 62 elements. It is noticed that the result remains
 stable even we vary the residual error precision from \np{E-5} to \np{E-9}. By