wip

diff --git a/supercomp11/supercomp11.tex b/supercomp11/supercomp11.tex
index a7bc09a5ad9d58c58ad6fc8dec1c0e1df654cc72..2c1cb7cd7c5c3447d8a9f7512b2e966da66d08c1 100644 (file)
--- a/supercomp11/supercomp11.tex
+++ b/supercomp11/supercomp11.tex
@@ -638,13 +638,28 @@ With these constraints in mind, we defined the following metrics:
 In this section, the results for the different simulations will be presented,
 and we'll try to explain our observations.
 
 In this section, the results for the different simulations will be presented,
 and we'll try to explain our observations.
 

-\FIXME{cluster vs. grid : cluster légèrement plus rapide, mais c'est tout -> chose to give results for grid only.}
+\subsubsection{Cluster vs grid platforms}

 
 

-\FIXME{explain how to read the graphs}
+As mentioned earlier, we simulated the different algorithms on two kinds of
+physical platforms: clusters and grids.  A first observation that we can make,
+is that the graphs we draw from the data have a similar aspect for the two kinds
+of platforms.  The only noticeable difference is that the algorithms need a bit
+more time to achieve the convergence on the grid platforms, than on clusters.
+Nevertheless their relative performances remain generally identical.

 
 

-\subsubsection{Main results}
+This suggests that the relative performances of the different strategies are not
+influenced by the characteristics of the physical platform.  The differences in
+the convergence times can be explained by the fact that on the grid platforms,
+distant sites are interconnected by links of smaller bandwith.
+
+Therefore, in the following, we'll only discuss the results for the grid
+platforms.  The different results are presented on the
+figures~\ref{fig.results1} and~\ref{fig.resultsN}.

 
 

-\begin{figure}
+\FIXME{explain how to read the graphs}
+ratio 1:1 not given here
+
+\begin{figure*}[p]

   \centering
   \includegraphics[width=.5\linewidth]{data/graphs/R1-1:10-grid-line}%
   \includegraphics[width=.5\linewidth]{data/graphs/R1-10:1-grid-line}
   \centering
   \includegraphics[width=.5\linewidth]{data/graphs/R1-1:10-grid-line}%
   \includegraphics[width=.5\linewidth]{data/graphs/R1-10:1-grid-line}


@@ -654,17 +669,9 @@ and we'll try to explain our observations.
   \includegraphics[width=.5\linewidth]{data/graphs/R1-10:1-grid-hcube}
   \caption{Real mode, initially on an only mode, comp/comm ratio = 1/10 (left), or 10/1 (right).}
   \label{fig.results1}
   \includegraphics[width=.5\linewidth]{data/graphs/R1-10:1-grid-hcube}
   \caption{Real mode, initially on an only mode, comp/comm ratio = 1/10 (left), or 10/1 (right).}
   \label{fig.results1}

-\end{figure}
-
-On fig.~\ref{fig.results1}, \dots
-
-\subsubsection{With the virtual load extension}
+\end{figure*}

 
 

-\subsubsection{The $k$ parameter}
-
-\subsubsection{With an initial random repartition,  and larger platforms}
-
-\begin{figure}
+\begin{figure*}[p]

   \centering
   \includegraphics[width=.5\linewidth]{data/graphs/RN-1:10-grid-line}%
   \includegraphics[width=.5\linewidth]{data/graphs/RN-10:1-grid-line}
   \centering
   \includegraphics[width=.5\linewidth]{data/graphs/RN-1:10-grid-line}%
   \includegraphics[width=.5\linewidth]{data/graphs/RN-10:1-grid-line}


@@ -674,7 +681,17 @@ On fig.~\ref{fig.results1}, \dots
   \includegraphics[width=.5\linewidth]{data/graphs/RN-10:1-grid-hcube}
   \caption{Real mode, random initial distribution, comp/comm ratio = 1/10 (left), or 10/1 (right).}
   \label{fig.resultsN}
   \includegraphics[width=.5\linewidth]{data/graphs/RN-10:1-grid-hcube}
   \caption{Real mode, random initial distribution, comp/comm ratio = 1/10 (left), or 10/1 (right).}
   \label{fig.resultsN}

-\end{figure}
+\end{figure*}
+
+\subsubsection{Main results}
+
+On fig.~\ref{fig.results1}, \dots
+
+\subsubsection{With the virtual load extension}
+
+\subsubsection{The $k$ parameter}
+
+\subsubsection{With an initial random repartition,  and larger platforms}

 
 \subsubsection{With integer load}
 
 
 \subsubsection{With integer load}