correct of eexecution to execution

diff --git a/paper.tex b/paper.tex
index b272684ae8931f84ada9d6f2543cea793822fe50..d6d57d05c284e0dc348a3e0dcffdf79c8d2e3d34 100644 (file)
--- a/paper.tex
+++ b/paper.tex
@@ -688,7 +688,7 @@ communication times measured at the first iteration to predict energy
 consumption and the execution time of the parallel application at every available
 frequency.  Then, it selects the scaling factor that gives the best trade-off
 between energy reduction and performance which is the maximum distance between
 consumption and the execution time of the parallel application at every available
 frequency.  Then, it selects the scaling factor that gives the best trade-off
 between energy reduction and performance which is the maximum distance between

-the energy and the inverted eexecution time curves.  To evaluate this method, we
+the energy and the inverted execution time curves.  To evaluate this method, we

 have applied it to the NAS benchmarks and it was compared to Rauber and Rünger
 methods while being executed on the simulator SimGrid.  The results showed that
 our method, outperforms Rauber and Rünger's methods in terms of energy-performance
 have applied it to the NAS benchmarks and it was compared to Rauber and Rünger
 methods while being executed on the simulator SimGrid.  The results showed that
 our method, outperforms Rauber and Rünger's methods in terms of energy-performance