Remarques sur les figures 1 et 2

diff --git a/paper.tex b/paper.tex
index ab8f9abfcbef3367f53947788140445861fcb16a..d826f581253088744563aab55fc3ffc0227f5d12 100644 (file)
--- a/paper.tex
+++ b/paper.tex
@@ -569,11 +569,11 @@ The execution times between both algorithms is significant with different grid a
 \includegraphics[width=100mm]{cluster_x_nodes_nx_150_and_nx_170.pdf}
 \end{center}
 \caption{Various grid configurations with the matrix sizes 150$^3$ and 170$^3$}
+\LZK{CE, la légende de la Figure 3 est trop large. Remplacer les N$_x\times$N$_y\times$N$_z$ par $Mat1$=150$^3$ et $Mat2$=170$^3$ comme dans la Table 1}
 \label{fig:01}
 \end{figure}
 
 \subsubsection{Simulations for two different inter-clusters network speeds\\}
-
 In this section, the experiments  compare the  behavior of  the algorithms  running on a
 speeder inter-cluster  network (N2) and  also on  a less performant  network (N1) respectively defined in the test conditions Table~\ref{tab:02}.
 %\RC{Il faut définir cela avant...}
@@ -585,6 +585,7 @@ the  network speed  drops down (variation of 12.5\%), the  difference between  t
 \centering
 \includegraphics[width=100mm]{cluster_x_nodes_n1_x_n2.pdf}
 \caption{Various grid configurations with networks $N1$ vs. $N2$}
+\LZK{CE, remplacer les ``,'' des décimales par un ``.''}
 \label{fig:02}
 \end{figure}
 
@@ -601,6 +602,19 @@ the  network speed  drops down (variation of 12.5\%), the  difference between  t
 
 
 
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+