1 This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-1.40.10 (TeX Live 2009/Debian) (format=pdflatex 2012.12.6) 1 JUL 2013 11:28
3 %&-line parsing enabled.
5 (./review.tex (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/base/article.cls
6 Document Class: article 2007/10/19 v1.4h Standard LaTeX document class
7 (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/base/size10.clo
8 File: size10.clo 2007/10/19 v1.4h Standard LaTeX file (size option)
12 \c@subsection=\count81
13 \c@subsubsection=\count82
15 \c@subparagraph=\count84
18 \abovecaptionskip=\skip41
19 \belowcaptionskip=\skip42
22 \openout1 = `review.aux'.
24 LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for OML/cmm/m/it on input line 4.
25 LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 4.
26 LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for T1/cmr/m/n on input line 4.
27 LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 4.
28 LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for OT1/cmr/m/n on input line 4.
29 LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 4.
30 LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for OMS/cmsy/m/n on input line 4.
31 LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 4.
32 LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for OMX/cmex/m/n on input line 4.
33 LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 4.
34 LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for U/cmr/m/n on input line 4.
35 LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 4.
36 LaTeX Font Info: External font `cmex10' loaded for size
37 (Font) <12> on input line 5.
38 LaTeX Font Info: External font `cmex10' loaded for size
39 (Font) <8> on input line 5.
40 LaTeX Font Info: External font `cmex10' loaded for size
41 (Font) <6> on input line 5.
44 LaTeX Warning: No \author given.
48 {/var/lib/texmf/fonts/map/pdftex/updmap/pdftex.map}]
49 Overfull \hbox (6.74693pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 88--88
50 [] \OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 below. An *iso*line would normally be expected to delineat
55 Overfull \hbox (6.74693pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 88--88
56 [] \OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 of the *same* intensity, so it's not obvious why a std devn
61 Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 88--88
62 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 be associated with one. This doesn't become clear until wel
67 Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 88--88
68 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 section 6!! The authors need to explain (even if only briefl
73 Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 88--88
74 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 associating a pixel with an isoline removes noise *early* in
79 Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 88--88
80 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 paper. I would suggest moving figure 4(a,b,c) to the introd
85 Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 88--88
86 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 and adding the set of isolines that their process adds to th
91 Overfull \hbox (6.74693pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 88--88
92 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 noisy window. Since it's only an 11x11 window, there should
97 Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 88--88
98 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 the edge region, then something like the isoline through eve
103 Overfull \hbox (11.99689pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 108--108
104 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 There is a key inconsistency in presentation .. there is a s
109 Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 108--108
110 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 that 'most common' images are continuous and continuous few
115 Overfull \hbox (27.74675pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 108--108
116 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 Such images would contain little information and be of littl
121 Overfull \hbox (11.99689pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 108--108
122 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 However, tests have been conducted on 'real' images with no
127 Overfull \hbox (6.74693pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 108--108
128 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 of edges - see figure 7b. If the continuity and few edges co
133 Overfull \hbox (6.74693pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 108--108
134 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 actually important (as results suggest), then these referenc
139 Overfull \hbox (17.24684pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 115--115
140 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 Circular poly-isolines are apparently excluded which would s
145 Overfull \hbox (27.74675pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 125--125
146 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 In general, the paper could be a lot better written. The au
151 Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 125--125
152 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 remove the 'noise' (in the sense of unnecessary words and ph
157 Overfull \hbox (11.99689pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 134--134
158 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 Similarly, figure 9 contains excess noise in the form of mea
163 Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 134--134
164 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 digits in numbers presented. By convention, if you write
168 Missing character: There is no  in font cmtt10!
169 Missing character: There is no ± in font cmtt10!
170 LaTeX Font Info: External font `cmex10' loaded for size
171 (Font) <7> on input line 136.
172 LaTeX Font Info: External font `cmex10' loaded for size
173 (Font) <5> on input line 136.
175 Overfull \hbox (9.13957pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 135--139
176 \OT1/cmr/m/n/10 That is not ex-act: Let us con-sider a noisy $512 \OMS/cmsy/m/n
177 /10 ^^B \OT1/cmr/m/n/10 512$ pixel im-age of PSNR=19.50 dB.
181 Overfull \hbox (6.74693pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 150--150
182 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 This table would be further improved by reporting the *impro
187 Overfull \hbox (6.74693pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 215--215
188 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 If they just 'propose to address' something, then this paper
193 Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 215--215
194 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 reference list - just use the author(s)' names as in the sug
199 Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 215--215
200 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 more precise wording is needed: I don't think anyone is inte
205 Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 215--215
206 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 The final sentence is almost inviting a reader to skip readi
211 Overfull \hbox (6.74693pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 264--264
212 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 Giving the actual rates (in terms, say, of frames per second
217 Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 264--264
218 [] \OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 be even better in putting the author's current work into co
223 Overfull \hbox (17.24684pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 276--276
224 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 'apparently sub-optimal' implies that they might really be o
229 Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 276--276
230 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 it would seem that you're referring to the usual trade-off b
235 Overfull \hbox (22.4968pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 276--276
236 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 lower quality algortithms that run faster .. so say that ..
241 Overfull \hbox (43.49661pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 311--311
242 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 .. have been published. Where?? At least some sample refere
247 Overfull \hbox (6.74693pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 339--339
248 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 Nvidia themselves are rather vague about this, but that's no
253 Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 339--339
254 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 vagueness into (hopefully) carefully written and objective p
259 Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 339--339
260 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 perspective with the clock rate. I shouldn't have to look t
265 Overfull \hbox (27.74675pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 374--374
266 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 The 'A' of CUDA is 'architecture' .. adding 'model' is not n
271 Overfull \hbox (11.99689pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 374--374
272 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 lie in the same n mod 2^7 address block .. not an arbitrary
277 Overfull \hbox (27.74675pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 412--412
278 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 Small point, but this is a journal paper .. so you should ge
283 Overfull \hbox (6.74693pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 427--427
284 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 'As introduced above' .. where ?? In the previous para, you'
289 Overfull \hbox (11.99689pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 427--427
290 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 If you want to persist with this, then you should give some
295 Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 427--427
296 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 There are many images used for testing image processing algo
301 Overfull \hbox (22.4968pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 487--487
302 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 You're defining a notation here .. don't use words implying
307 Overfull \hbox (6.74693pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 487--487
308 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 You mean that the two segments S^n and S^p must have the sam
313 Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 504--504
314 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 which appears to have the *same* intensity along its whole l
319 Overfull \hbox (17.24684pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 556--556
320 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 how do you have C_x(Z(S^n)) .. having been obtained in the *
325 Overfull \hbox (53.99652pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 620--620
326 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 (you use deviation in another sense also .. so you need to b
331 Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 636--636
332 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 The notation [0;D] for the set [0..D] is also unusual and pr
337 Overfull \hbox (6.74693pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 665--665
338 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 only for P_l, not for the images themselves, which are much
343 Overfull \hbox (1.49698pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 665--665
344 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 effort. In this case, it would appear that there are a suff
349 Overfull \hbox (6.74693pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 677--677
350 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 Results should ideally separate out time to transfer images
355 Overfull \hbox (6.74693pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 677--677
356 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 and GPU computation times, since for applications (most pres
361 Overfull \hbox (6.74693pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 686--686
362 []\OT1/cmtt/m/n/10 There is a disappointing lack of data for values of l other
366 [14] [15] (./review.aux) )
367 Here is how much of TeX's memory you used:
368 232 strings out of 495028
369 2464 string characters out of 1181229
370 52031 words of memory out of 3000000
371 3492 multiletter control sequences out of 15000+50000
372 7794 words of font info for 28 fonts, out of 3000000 for 9000
373 28 hyphenation exceptions out of 8191
374 23i,6n,17p,305b,245s stack positions out of 5000i,500n,10000p,200000b,50000s
375 </usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts
376 /cm/cmbx12.pfb></usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts/cm/cmex10.
377 pfb></usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts/cm/cmmi10.pfb></usr/s
378 hare/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts/cm/cmmi7.pfb></usr/share/texmf-t
379 exlive/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts/cm/cmr10.pfb></usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts
380 /type1/public/amsfonts/cm/cmr12.pfb></usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/publi
381 c/amsfonts/cm/cmr17.pfb></usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts/c
382 m/cmr7.pfb></usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts/cm/cmsy10.pfb>
383 </usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts/cm/cmti10.pfb></usr/share
384 /texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts/cm/cmtt10.pfb>
385 Output written on review.pdf (15 pages, 157774 bytes).
387 95 PDF objects out of 1000 (max. 8388607)
388 0 named destinations out of 1000 (max. 500000)
389 1 words of extra memory for PDF output out of 10000 (max. 10000000)